COMMENTARY | COLUMNISTS | THOMAS ELIAS

Gasoline price gouging evidence grows

Just about two years ago, when gasoline prices in most of California last moved well above the $4-per-gallon level, crude oil cost $147 a barrel. Oil companies said the high price of crude was a major factor in that price spike.

This spring, when gas pump prices again jumped above $4 in many places, crude oil fell less than $50 per barrel awhile before recovering to about $60 near the end of May.

So it’s no wonder that consumer advocates rail at gasoline prices, which are back near peak levels after a late-winter respite. In fact, evidence is mounting that prices in this state are being set to gouge consumers, even though there is no certainty of collusion between the four companies controlling almost 80 percent of the state’s gasoline production.

Also pointing toward gouging is the fact that oil companies repeatedly claim gas refinery outages are big factors in California price spikes. When fire hit a non-operational fluid catalytic cracking unit at Exxon’s refinery in the Los Angeles suburb of Torrance, prices rose all over California, yet the burned part of the plant had been doing nothing.

Another statewide rise came when there was a labor problem at Tesoro’s refinery in Martinez, east of San Francisco, which has long been unreliable.

But there’s no rationale for a refinery problem in Northern California to affect prices in Southern California or vice versa.

Says a retired 32-year engineer at Valero’s refinery in Benicia, “The pipelines that leave Bay Area refineries do not connect with the pipelines in Southern California.”

In short, the fact there may be a shortage for a while in one part of the state doesn’t mean there will be one in the other large region. A comprehensive Kinder-Morgan Energy Partners map of the state’s gasoline pipelines confirms a lack of linkage between north and south.

While a refinery outage in one half of California might create a bit of a shortage there, it should not affect the other half. But shortages in one area invariably raise prices around the whole state.

Those two peculiarities definitely suggest gouging. There are also the springtime statements of major oil company executives to their stockholders and financial analysts.

Said Greg Maxwell, chief financial officer of Phillips 66, “First quarter gasoline cracks [the difference between the price paid for crude oil and the price of petroleum products made from it, including gasoline] for the Western Pacific region were $20.21 per barrel compared with $7.46 last quarter, resulting in record earnings for the region.”

Reported a top Chevron official, “Margins increased earnings by $435 million driven by unplanned industry downtime and tight product supply on the West Coast.”

And Tesoro chief executive Gregory Goff said, “In California, crack spreads have improved. … There’s no question that during the first quarter with what happened to Tesoro (which sells under the Shell and USA labels, among others) as a result of the [labor] disruption at the Martinez refinery … it was very supportive to the margin environment there.”

In short, when the companies produced less gasoline and charged more for it, their profits soared. So they had no incentive to delay planned maintenance outages at some refineries when unplanned disruptions shut down others.

One result of all this was that Californians in late May were paying an average of $1.30 more per gallon for gasoline than drivers in other states. Only about 15 cents of that could be ascribed to the state’s higher gas taxes.

Spokesmen for the Western Oil and Gas Association did not return calls seeking comment.

All this led the Consumer Watchdog advocacy group to call for a federal Justice Department investigation of possible price gouging.

“Since the beginning of February, California’s 14 oil refineries have suffered 10 serious slowdowns or shutdowns,” said Jamie Court, the group’s president.

“This is the only industry in America that profits more when its factories repeatedly break down. Since four oil refiners control 78 percent of the gasoline market, such an oligopoly can easily withhold needed products to drive up prices.”

Put it all together and it’s clear that gasoline prices here are far higher than they ought to be. Whether or not that’s a criminal matter has yet to be determined.


Elias is the author of “The Burzynski Breakthrough,” available in a soft-cover fourth edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com.

View all comments
User Response
1 UserComments
john Faulstich 12:00am June 2, 2015

"When fire hit a non-operational fluid catalytic cracking unit at Exxon’s refinery in the Los Angeles suburb of Torrance, prices rose all over California, yet the burned part of the plant had been doing nothing." is very misleading. As I understand it, the unit had been down unplanned for several days and was close to a restart. The explosion made it obvious to the industry that the unit would be down for a very long time, and that gasoline resupply from other regions would be needed. "While a refinery outage in one half of California might create a bit of a shortage there, it should not affect the other half. But shortages in one area invariably raise prices around the whole state." shows the author does not know how supply in the industry occurs. The first place to look for resupply to southern CA is northern CA, and if you are selling there you would be foolish to sell for less than you could if you supplied the southern part of the state.