COMMENTARY | COLUMNISTS | JEFFREY GITOMER

Eiffel Tower an iconic monument and a critical lesson

By

We went to visit the Eiffel Tower again — our fourth visit in five years.

What do you know about the Eiffel Tower?

When it was built it was, to say the least, the most controversial structure of all time. Hundreds protested it, criticized it, campaigned against it, said it was a disgrace to architecture, and predicted it would be the ruination of Paris.

The story is fascinating. You can read about its history on Wikipedia, where I learned, “Some of the protesters eventually changed their minds when the tower was built. Others remained unconvinced. Guy de Maupassant supposedly ate lunch in the tower's restaurant every day. When asked why, he answered that it was the one place in Paris where one could not see the structure.”

Epilogue: The tower was built to world acclaim. It’s one of the most impressive structures in the universe. It’s not just stunning to look at, it’s also inspiring to be in its presence. An estimated 10 million people a year visit to admire its glory. It is the heart and soul of Paris, and it’s the symbol by which the city has been known for more than 100 years.

At the base of the tower there’s an amazing statue to honor Gustave Eiffel; it's interesting to note that none of the people who criticized him have statues at the base.

How much more wrong could the protesters and critics have been?

Were they trying to build up or tear down? Encourage or discourage? Encourage or disparage? In hindsight, the critics seem contrite, shallow, self-serving, prejudiced and baseless.

Kind of like today’s critics.

Call it what you will, a naysayer, by any other name, is just that.

• Is it an opposing point of view, or criticism?

• Is it a “pundit,” or a critic?

• Is it “commentary,” or just criticism?

• Is it an op-ed column, or criticism?

• Is it a “panel discussion,” or criticism?

And what are these people really saying?

• Are they debating? Or discussing and deciding?

• Are they blaming “it” or “them"? Or are they offering answers and taking responsibility for the remedy?

• Do they talk about what they will do? Or what someone else didn't do?

• Did they talk about what didn’t happen, who’s wrong and why it won’t work? Or did they offer their ideas about what could be?

Do these critics ever offer answers, ideas or recommendations?

Critics try to label the “wrongdoers” into a group for easier identification — unions, teachers, liberals, conservatives, left, right, or in your familiar terms: the competition or the purchasing department.

It’s never everyone, is it?

And of course, today’s world paints criticism as some sort of pious, politically correct and necessary element of society. But people criticize to suit themselves, further their agenda or even make the sale.

In the late 1800s, Finnish composer Jean Sibelius said, “Pay no attention to people who criticize. No statue was ever erected to a critic.” And in the late 1960s, the great Glenn W. Turner added, “But the people they have criticized, many statues have gone up.”

Makes me stop and think. I hope it does the same for you.

Got statue? Or are you just criticizing?

How much of your time is wasted criticizing other people, their ideas or their thoughts? And how could you be investing that time to build your own monument? Your own Eiffel Tower?

Convert your criticism to answers, resolve, solutions and responsibility. You’ll be thought of as a thinker, make more sales, build stronger relationships, earn a better reputation, be seen as a resource, and be a happier person.

Dale Carnegie, author of the 70-year best-seller, "How to Win Friends & Influence People," nailed it in 1915 when he penned his most dominant principle, “Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain (and most fools do).”

There should be a law that says all criticism must be followed by a solution, an answer, a resolve or an idea. That would shut a lot of people up, or at least make them think and see the positive side of things.

Footnote: Apple just released the much anticipated iPhone 5. The critics lined up to tell you how it “falls short” or “disappoints” or some baloney about speed or connectivity or maps or keyboards. They gave it three and a half stars. Meanwhile Apple, in spite of the critics, has sold 10 million phones in the first 30 days for $400 a device. Do that math. I wonder how much critics earn.


Gitomer is the author of "The Sales Bible" and "The Little Red Book of Selling." President of Charlotte-based Buy Gitomer, he gives seminars, runs annual sales meetings, and conducts Internet training programs on selling and customer service at trainone.com. He can be reached at salesman@gitomer.com.

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

User Response
0 UserComments

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.




Subscribe Today!

contact info: Iam Pam