• News
  • SAN DIEGO
  • Construction

Building permits: Residential plummet; nonresidential stronger

Related Special Reports

Residential permits took a dive in San Diego County, while nonresidential permits continued to be strong in January.

According to McGraw-Hill Construction, permits were pulled for what will amount to $73,375,000 in residential construction, a category that includes both single- and multifamily homes.

January’s total represented a 41 percent drop from the January 2012 residential permit total of about $125.19 million.

The picture appeared quite a bit different for California as a whole. McGraw Hill reported $948.87 million worth of residential permits were pulled in January -- or 9 percent more than the roughly $871.14 million in such permits pulled during the like month in 2012.

Nonresidential construction in San Diego County, which includes all commercial building along with nonresidential alterations and additions, amounted to $497.33 million in January 2013 -- or more than double the $216.1 million figure registered in January 2012.

Nonresidential permit activity was less strong statewide in January 2013 when compared to January 2012 -- dropping by about 20 percent from $1.16 billion to $929.32 million year-over-year.

The McGraw Hill report didn’t break out non-building construction for San Diego County. This category can be a significant part of the total depending on the projects, which include everything from bridges to sewage treatment plants.

Statewide, non-building activity amounted to $1.2 billion in January -- or about 59 percent less than the roughly $2.96 billion figure registered in January 2012.

Source: McGraw-Hill Construction | Compiled by: Jenny Ross

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

User Response
0 UserComments

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.