• News
  • SAN DIEGO
  • Law

High court declines to hear Mt. Soledad case for now

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review the Mount Soledad cross case, but that doesn't mean the high court won't eventually have its say, according to local law professors.

In the most recent ruling of the long-running dispute, a district court said the cross must be removed from public land. Supporters of the 43-foot monument wanted to skip the appeals court because they claim the Ninth Circuit has been hostile to the cross in earlier rulings.

The Supreme Court, however, wants the case to go through the usual chain of appeal.

Glenn Smith, a constitutional law professor at California Western School of Law, said in the opinion, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that he wanted all the issues to be preserved, perhaps indicating a future action.

"He's signaling that he's interested in this issue and is following it," Smith said. "This just puts off a Supreme Court decision by a year or two."

The Obama administration disagrees with a lower court order for the cross to be removed, but said the case should go to the appeals court first.

The justices did not comment Monday in rejecting the association's appeal.

The case is Mt. Soledad Memorial Association v. Trunk, 13-1061.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

User Response
0 UserComments

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

Subscribe Today!