• News
  • SAN DIEGO
  • Finance

Reynolds to Acquire Lorillard in $27.4 Billion Tobacco Deal (1)

July 15 (Bloomberg) -- Reynolds American Inc., the producer of Camel and Pall Mall cigarettes, agreed to buy rival Lorillard Inc. for $27.4 billion including debt in a deal that reduces the 400-year-old U.S. tobacco industry to two major competitors.

Reynolds will pay a mixture of cash and stock valuing each Lorillard share at $68.88, according to a statement. British American Tobacco Plc of the U.K. will fund $4.7 billion of the transaction to maintain its 42 percent stake in Reynolds. BAT’s British rival Imperial Tobacco Group Plc will acquire brands including Kool and blu e-cigarettes for $7.1 billion.

After decades of anti-tobacco health campaigns, slumping demand has put pressure on the industry to consolidate. U.S. cigarette shipments fell by a median of 2.9 percent in the first quarter among the nation’s top tobacco companies, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Industries. Merging Reynolds and Lorillard would help the companies cope with the slowdown and create a more potent competitor to market leader Altria Inc.

“It’s transformative because it creates a duopoly in the U.S. and will help them to manage the volume declines,” Philip Gorham, an analyst at Morningstar Inc. in Amsterdam, said before the transaction was announced. “They are still getting younger smokers in developed markets, but not at the rate as the old ones are dying off.”

Excluding debt, the purchase is about $25 billion based on shares outstanding. The enlarged company will have annual revenue of more than $11 billion and operating income of about $5 billion, Reynolds said in the statement.

Lorillard Drops

The deal -- which followed months of on-again, off-again talks -- will have to pass antitrust hurdles. To help meet those, Imperial Tobacco will acquire brands that also include Salem, Winston and Maverick. The U.K. company said separately that it will fund the transaction entirely through debt.

“The most surprising element is that Imperial is taking the e-cigarette business from Lorillard,” Gorham said today. “It was probably the sweetener that convinced them to buy what is essentially a selection of third-tier brands.”

Lorillard slid about 5 percent to $63.75 at 7:51 a.m. in New York pre-market trading. Reynolds fell 2.2 percent to $61.80. Imperial Tobacco rose 1.1 percent to 2,769 pence in London, while BAT eased 0.5 percent to 3,576 pence.

Reynolds said it expects cost savings of about $800 million and for the deal to be accretive to earnings in the first year.

Susan Cameron will continue as chief executive officer of Reynolds after the acquisition, and the company will remain headquartered in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Murray Kessler, chairman, president and CEO of Greensboro, North Carolina-based Lorillard, will join Reynolds’s board.

Fresh Ammunition

Lorillard’s biggest product, Newport, will give Reynolds fresh ammunition against Altria, whose brands account for more than half of the U.S. retail cigarette industry. Altria’s Marlboro by itself has market share in the U.S. of about 44 percent, according to the company’s website.

Reynolds, Lorillard and London-based BAT have been in talks since last fall to reach an agreement that would satisfy all three parties, people familiar with the matter have said. They made a tentative deadline of July to reach a deal because of a standstill agreement by BAT not to raise its stake in Reynolds without the approval of Reynolds’s board until this month.

BAT’s agreement keeping it from increasing its stake in Reynolds dates back to the merger of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings Inc. with Brown & Williamson Tobacco. The Federal Trade Commission is likely to take a hard look at the latest proposed transaction, said David Balto, a Washington attorney and former policy director for the FTC who litigated BAT’s merger with Reynolds in 2004.

Brown & Williamson

The FTC allowed that deal to go through because Brown & Williamson was losing market share and Lorillard was still around as a viable competitor, according to a brief released by the FTC. The market is more consolidated now, and this deal will face serious scrutiny, Balto said.

“The FTC will be very concerned about competition in this market,” he said in a phone interview. “The FTC will want to make sure some level of competition is restored.”

There is a chance that just selling off the minor brands to Imperial won’t be enough, he said.

“There is a difference between these brands being in the hands of a powerful company like Lorillard and being owned by an upstart like Imperial,” Balto said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Duane D. Stanford in Atlanta at dstanford2@bloomberg.net; David Welch in New York at dwelch12@bloomberg.net; Gabi Thesing in London at gthesing@bloomberg.net To contact the editors responsible for this story: Nick Turner at nturner7@bloomberg.net; Mohammed Hadi at mhadi1@bloomberg.net Stephen West

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

User Response
0 UserComments

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

Subscribe Today!