• News
  • SAN DIEGO
  • Water

2 lawmakers vote no on California water bond

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- While California lawmakers were nearly unanimous in their approval of a $7.5 billion water spending plan to go before voters in November, two lawmakers cast votes against it Wednesday night.

_ Republican Assemblyman Tim Donnelly of Twin Peaks, a former gubernatorial candidate, said the plan did not include enough money for reservoirs and water storage, although Brown and legislative Democrats agreed to boost it to $2.7 billion to appease Republican lawmakers who originally sought $3 billion. He also objected to its bond financing, which he said will saddle the state with billions in debt.

“Gov. Jerry Brown claims we have a surplus, so use that money to fund the water storage and conveyance we desperately need,” he said in a statement.

_ Democratic Assemblyman Wesley Chesbro of Arcata told The Associated Press he fears the Trinity River in his North Coast district will be diverted to fill reservoirs without $1 million in protections he had sought to include in the bond. He said without that funding, protecting area rivers, fish and the economy of the North Coast “was not much of a priority in the measure that will be placed on the November ballot.”

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

User Response
0 UserComments

Leave Your Comment

Comments are moderated by SDDT, in accordance with the SDDT Comment Policy, and may not appear on this commentary until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

SDDT Comment Policy: SDDT encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give SDDT the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. SDDT Privacy Statement.

Subscribe Today!