Advertised public notices, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, are required by California law. Within the individual category, notices are arranged by print publish day in reverse chronological order.
Online, on a selected date, the notices are arranged in alphabetical order.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Case No. 37-2014-00006413-CU-MC-CTL
GROSSMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff,
ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE MATTER OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2014-23 APPROVING SITE LEASE, SUBLEASE, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GROSSMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND C.W. DRIVER FOR THE HELIX CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL PHASE II MODERNIZATION PROJECT, Defendants.NOTICE! YOU HAVE BEEN SUED. THE COURT MAY DECIDE AGAINST YOU WITHOUT YOUR BEING HEARD UNLESS YOU ANSWER BY MAY 8, 2014. READ INFORMATION BELOW.
AVISO! USTED HA SIDO DEMANDADO. EL TRIBUNAL PUEDE DECIDIR CONTRA USTED SIN AUDIENCIA A MENOS QUE USTED CONTESTE ANTES DEL 8 DE MAYO, 2014. LEA LA INFORMACIÓN QUE SIGUE.
TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE MATTER OF:
Plaintiff, GROSSMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (District), has filed a Complaint to validate the District's adoption of Resolution No. 2014-23 approving the following:
1. The Site Lease dated February 28, 2014, entered into between the District and C. W. Driver, providing for the lease of real property pursuant to Education Code section 17406;
2. The Sublease Agreement dated February 28, 2014, entered into between the District and C. W. Driver; and
3. The Construction Services Agreement dated February 28, 2014, entered into between the District and C. W. Driver for the Helix Charter High School Phase II Modernization Project.
You may contest the legality or validity of this matter by appearing and filing a written answer to the Complaint not later than 31 days from April 7, 2014. Any persons who contest the legality or validation of the matter will not be subject to punitive action such as wage garnishment or seizure of their real personal property. (Code Civ. Proc., § 861.1.)
A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your typewritten answer must be in proper legal form if you want the Court to hear your case.
Unless you so answer, your default will be entered upon application by the District and the District may apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the Complaint. Persons who contest the legality or validity of the matter will not be subject to punitive action, such as wage garnishment or seizure of their real or personal property.
YOU MAY SEEK THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY IN ANY MATTER CONNECTED WITH THE COMPLAINT OR THIS SUMMONS. SUCH ATTORNEY SHOULD BE CONSULTED PROMPTLY SO THAT YOUR PLEADING MAY BE FILED OR ENTERED WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY THE SUMMONS. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW AN ATTORNEY, YOU MAY CALL AN ATTORNEY REFERRAL SERVICE OR A LEGAL AID OFFICE (LISTED IN THE PHONE BOOK).
The name and address of the Court is:
San Diego County Superior Court
330 W. Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
The name, address and telephone number of the District's attorney is:
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Tyree K. Dorward
655 West Broadway, 15th Floor
San Diego, California 92101
Telephone No.: (619) 525-1300
Dated: MARCH 28, 2014
CLERK OF THE COURT
By: R. CERSOSIMO,
TYREE K. DORWARD
ELLEN P. HEAD
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
655 West Broadway, 15th Floor
San Diego, California 92101
Pub. Apr 7, 14, 21, 28-00119643
INDEX NO. 13-9091
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NASSAU
Plaintiff designates Nassau County as the place of trial. The basis of the venue is the situs of the chattel located at Levittown, New York
SYLVIA WEINMAN AND ROBERT A. WEINMAN Plaintiff
JANE WEINMAN DefendantTO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED
to answer the Amended Verified Complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your Answer, or if the Amended Verified Complaint is not served with this Amended Summons, to serve a notice of Appearance, on the Plaintiffs attorneys within twenty (20) days after the service of this Amended Summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within thirty  days after the service is complete if this Amended Summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to appear to Answer, Judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the Complaint, together with costs of this action.
This action seeks to determine the rights and interests of Sylvia Weinman, Robert Weinman, and Jane Weinman with respect to a piece of real property located at 146 Sunrise Lane, Levittown, New York
, or in the alternative to remove Jane Weinman as partial owner of the property located at 146 Sunrise Lane, Levittown, New York
, which property is more particularly described as:
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the builds and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Hempstead at Levittown, County of Nassau and State of New York, known as Lot 20 in Block 245 on a certain map entitled Section A-A Subdivision Map of Property known as Levittown, filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Nassau on March 1, 1949 as Map No. 4647, being more particularly bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Sunrise Lane distant 70 feet north from the corner formed by the intersection of said Sunrise Lane with the northerly side of Hook Lane;
RUNNING THENCE northerly, along said easterly side of Sunrise Lane, 60 feet;
THENCE easterly, at right angles to Sunrise Lane, 100 feet;
THENCE southerly parallel with Sunrise Lane, 60 feet;
THENCE westerly, at right angles to Sunrise Lane, 100 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING.
Dated: Commack, New York
November 11, 2013
MARK H. WEISS, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
6165 Jericho Turnpike
Commack, New York 11725
Pub Mar 17, 24, 31, Apr 7 -00118618