A Delaware jury Thursday found in favor of San Diego-based Websense, ruling that the computer virus detection company did not infringe on the patent of a competitor.
The jury also ruled that the patent being asserted by Finjan, which brought the lawsuit, is invalid.
Websense (Nasdaq: WBSN) was represented by the law firm Cooley, with partner Anthony “Tony” Stiegler taking the lead.
"This is an area of exponential growth for the company, and is an area they expect to expand in for many years to come, so this is a very significant victory for the company," Stiegler said.
The patent at issue concerns computer security and detecting malware before it reaches the client computer.
The patent taught methods and systems to protect computers in a network from malware by scanning “downloadables” at a gateway. The gateway looks for suspicious operations and blocks downloadables containing such operations after comparison with a security policy.
The Cooley team established that the Websense-accused products do not identify a list of suspicious computer operations at the gateway and that the gateway in the Websense-accused products does not perform a comparison against a policy.
"We proved that Websense technology was different," Stiegler said.
Other members of the Websense legal team were Cooley partner John Kyle and associates Paul Batcher, Brian Lam, Erin Goodsell, José Rodriguez and Jennifer Fontaine, all based in San Diego.
Before trial, Finjan sought tens of millions of dollars in past and future damages.